Now please make it so that you have a setting in the playback quality to "Always watch HD and HQ videos when available" so I can stop having to click on the HD button.
How much more processing power do you think is required to actually be able to playback the 1080p quality?
I've been uploading 720p videos at my techvideoblog.com since 2005, I guess I'll have to consider recording now in 1080p and spend twice as much time uploading the HD quality videos.
3 weeks ago, I tried upload 1080P, took 20 hours and error shows up, I love it, I hope fast upload service. Only problem: it might slow everybody down.
As part of this, will you also be adding support for uploading and processing large 1080p HD video in avchd (.mts, .mtb) format? I've been able to upload smaller files in this format (.mts) but uploading of a 7 minute, 860GB file in this format failed repeatedly.
Youtube also doesn't support .mtb at all (.mtb is the format JVC Everio's software saves edited .mts files in).
Put me down as another user wondering what bit rate will be used for 1080 content. Also how will the anamorphic formats be handled, eg 1440x1080, 1888x1062, etc?
My guess is 1080p will be encoded and streamed at around 4mbit/s to keep the same quality per pixel ratio of the current Youtube 720p 2mbit/s contents.
This is very good news. Well done for the upgrade. The question... AVCHD output max 1080i. Those interlaced videos are going to converted to 1080p or users must upload 1080p to get 1080p playback on YouTube?
1080p is only going to suck up more of the bandwidth that you don't have. So many videos these days, including non-HQ/HD ones, take FOREVER to load. The existing quality you have now is fine, adding 1080p is only going to worsen the experience for everyone. Add more bandwidth/servers before releasing this! In theory it sounds good but in reality it sucks :P
Very nice, ive been waiting for this. Unfortunately, since there are over twice as many pixels in one 1080p frame as there are in a 720p frame, it it going to be buffer hell for people unless they have VERY fast internet. (At least 10 MBPS)
Glad to see I'm not the only one worried about the sound, but don't expect 32 bit since very few if anything can playback at that. However 24 bit is definitely possible, but they really should fix the bitrate first. I mean really, ~124kbps AAC? Really? Shouldn't we be using near-lossless for 1080p, if not pure lossless?
And for the user that asked me earlier what bitrate I'm uploading at: pure lossless. Lossless 32bit color video and 44.1KHz 16bit PCM audio.
Oh, though I should say that my most recent audio-videos had audio quality @ 96KHz 32 bit float PCM (they were exported MIDIs with a very high-quality soundfont)
If it makes you feel any better, YouTube actually supports up to 11 minutes. They've already said years ago that the ~10 minute limit was to reduce copy-righted content, since that's what apparently the majority of the videos that long were.
For anyone interested in specs and bitrates, here's what MediaInfo says about this example of a reletively high-motion video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2iyY9xLLwoY&fmt=37
General Complete name : F:\video.mp4 Format : MPEG-4 Format profile : Base Media / Version 2 Codec ID : mp42 File size : 81.0 MiB Duration : 2mn 22s Overall bit rate : 4 770 Kbps Encoded date : UTC 2009-11-11 17:58:50 Tagged date : UTC 2009-11-11 17:58:50 gsst : 0 gstd : 142988 gssd : BD075FE84
Video ID : 2 Format : AVC Format/Info : Advanced Video Codec Format profile : High@L4.0 Format settings, CABAC : Yes Format settings, ReFrames : 3 frames Codec ID : avc1 Codec ID/Info : Advanced Video Coding Duration : 2mn 22s Bit rate mode : Variable Bit rate : 4 641 Kbps Maximum bit rate : 9 367 Kbps Width : 1 920 pixels Height : 1 080 pixels Display aspect ratio : 16:9 Frame rate mode : Constant Frame rate : 29.970 fps Resolution : 24 bits Colorimetry : 4:2:0 Scan type : Progressive Bits/(Pixel*Frame) : 0.075 Stream size : 78.8 MiB (97%) Title : (C) 2007 Google Inc. v08.13.2007. Encoded date : UTC 2009-11-11 17:58:50 Tagged date : UTC 2009-11-11 17:58:54
Audio ID : 1 Format : AAC Format/Info : Advanced Audio Codec Format version : Version 4 Format profile : LC Format settings, SBR : No Codec ID : 40 Duration : 2mn 22s Bit rate mode : Variable Bit rate : 125 Kbps Maximum bit rate : 149 Kbps Channel(s) : 2 channels Channel positions : L R Sampling rate : 44.1 KHz Resolution : 16 bits Stream size : 2.13 MiB (3%) Title : (C) 2007 Google Inc. v08.13.2007. Encoded date : UTC 2009-11-11 17:58:50 Tagged date : UTC 2009-11-11 17:58:54
So DANG, just below 5 Megabits. Odd that it doesn't actually reach 5mbps, leaving enough room that could be filled with... oh I don't know maybe MORE BITS FOR AUDIO?!
I just realized that the lack of higher-quality audio is even sillier than I first thought. With YouTube throwing MEGAbits at higher-quality video (maxing out at >9mbps?!), they can't even spare just 200 more KILObits for audio? Really now? REALLY?!
I wouldn't have so much beef with this audio stuff IF THEY HADN'T LOWERED THE QUALITY FROM WHAT IT WAS (~232 VBR for 720p)
And I forgot to put my vote in for higher samplerate as well! 96KHz 24bit audio for at 1080p when the source supports it would rock.
And what about 60fps videos? I mean the freakin Nintendo 64 could render games at 60fps (F-Zero x), and here we are with our 1080p HD videos and we're still using 30fps. Hopefully this comes in the future (next year? since 1080p should be the highest quality available for quite a while).
How about adding a 1:1 scaling setting while viewing videos (either fullscreen, either normal) to go with this? Any vidcast-type video that contains text should benefit greatly from the lack of blurriness...
My videos run 1.2gb - 2gb for ~20min videos, do you think they are already 1080p? I know my vidcam is full HD (JVC Everio GZ-HD300). I don't upload direct to YT though. I encode it in Standard HD using Cyberlink Power Director. I guess I should look into this stuff.
Robin, speak for yourself, I live in Europe and I have no problem with youtube, on the other hand, we do have 100/100 where I live. What I do have a problem with is the flashplayer, which can bring down a Core 2 Duo-based computer to its knees with an SD-movie.
WHAT ABOUT THE UPLOADING TIME IN SUCH A CASE OF A HD (HIGH DEFINITION) VIDEOS? I MEAN HOW LONG WILL SUSCH VIDEOS WILL LAST IN THE MAXIMUM TIME OF THE 10 MINUTES ALLOWED BY THE YouTube WORLD WIDE WEB???? THANKS - CONSTANTINOS
P.S. TO YouTube TEAM ONLY:
WHAT ABOUT TO CONVERTER SOFTWARES FROM DD (STANDARD DEFINITION) HD (HIGH DEFINITION) VIDEOS????. IT IS WIDELY KNOWN THAT MOST OF THE VIDEO EDTITING SOFTWARES DOES IT WITH GREAT SUCCESS.
Could you please add a setting to turn scaling off? Because in fullscreen mode, 720p videos look bad scaled up on larger monitors. Oh, and the youtube logo and interface get blurry too, if monitor resolution != video resolution.
Are you going to improve your servers so the videos load at a streamable pace then? I've a relatively speedy university connection at the moment, and even the non-HD "HQ" videos load too slow for streamable viewing.
Ok, a little off the subject, but WTF youtube? Why is it that every time i log on, more & more of my favorite music videos are being removed 'cause of some copyright bullshit?!! If you let them have their way, more than half of youtube will be 'no longer available' Why is it that sony or wmg will snatch some vids but let others stay? And the 'violations' thing? What constitutes a 'violation'? Especially from a vid that has been up for YEARS with no problem or complaint? WTF?!
OMFG YOUTUBE HAVE YOU LOST YOUR MIND? You have the money to upgrade to 1080p WHY DONT YOU HAVE THE MONEY TO UPGRADE YOUR SERVERS.
I have 15mbps and cant watch a damn video in normal quality because so many people are on hogging bandwidth. How ever, for example 2:00PM EST, it seems like a time when most people arent on youtube and it runs in HD like very FAST!.
So basically, this feature is useless, because I cant fucking use it because you cant upgrade the damn servers and get more bandwidth.
Thanks for nothing. I hope more people leave YouTube.
Hmm, I uploaded a 23.976 frame rate video and it converted it to 29.970. Near 5 Mbps looks pretty good, but why lower the audio rate? I mean 120 something in AAC isn't bad, but still.
Very nice. We at the Sivartis Channel have been uploading full 1080p HD since the relaunch back in August. Can't wait to see "Robot, Ninja & Gay Guy" in full HD! ~Trav www.youtube.com/sivartis
algi, even if the source is interlaced, only big-screen CRTs can actually play an interlaced signal directly. All modern screens (plasma, LCD, OLED, etc.) can only display in progressive. When playing an interlaced signal, they actually convert it to progressive so that it can be displayed on-screen properly.
It's cool i have one video in 1080p and it will be switched but my Internet is 2 mb /s so it's definitely too slow to load even short full hd video ; /
Dear YouTube, PLEASE take a reality check. For most people the 720p is already causing performance issues, the Flash player is bad, and is stuttering on even high end setups, and your bandwidth can't keep up as it is.
After uploading and analyzing about two dozen videos of various formats and frame rates, I've discovered that they all get encoded to 29.970 fps now. Why do this and not keep their native frame rate? I didn't see any issues with playback like sync or frame blending, but I only used a short 1 minute clip. After looking at lots of other 1080p and 720p videos uploaded recently, most are 29.970 also. However, some are still 23.976 or 25.000, but very few. Please keep the frame rate native to avoid issues with quality and sync!
This is wonderful news. I have been using 1080P since the beginning of the year. This may take away some of the slight blur that shows up after upload. Thank you YouTube!!!!
Cool! But flash technology (plugin) is not too good for this. I hope you are considering open video format like that from html5 with "video" tags. I's now supported by Mozilla Firefox 3.5, and can be easily integrated into other browsers, as it's open :)
Here's an idea lets be happy with the original HD quality because it was good enough and made my computer slow. And then make it were everyday users like me can add videos over 10 minutes!
Some of the blogging / tech community doesn't seem to be that impressed?
I think it might be the demo video of the dog ... It's kinda blurry and doesn't show off the resolution that well, this one of mine is much better looking ..
hey visit my site tipsntrix.tk for all the tips and tricks you need and aslo for any computer realted help. Plz Thank You for any query email at contact@tipsntrix.tk or ayush@tipsntrix.tk
Yes, 1080p will serve high bandwidth customers but for us who are stuck with pricey 256kbps bandwidth here in India we cannot even see the lowest of the lowest bandwidth video.
Hence a suggestion, along with different format and speed of videos, have an audio stream of the video be available (min 32kbps, max 128kbps) for us to listen and enjoy.
PUT BACK THE HOW MANY VIDEOS I WATCHED ON YOUTUBE ON MY HOME PAGE ON YOUTUBE. WHY DID YOU GUY TAKE THAT OFF???? PUT IT BACK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It looks fantastic. What kind of HD camera used? For me it's not look pixelate at 1080p. Even if, it is not as smooth as the others, but still looks clear enough. Milan Hotels
Many people would be happy if an 1080i video could be translated lossles into 1080p. If you display 1080i in 1080p without deinterlacing, the edges become ragged. So it's only technically 1080p, but effectively 1080i.
(But when I posted my first comment, I didn't realize that there culd be cheap 1080p camcorders, as my mind is all-about half-professional ones.)
Noticed the following... "Have an HD camera? We would love to see your awesome 1080p videos! Be creative and choose subjects that really show off the beauty of your camera. We will run the best examples on our homepage in a future spotlight."
How will you make the selections? This is a new hobby for me, but I've been taking my HD camcorder along to gigs of a Finnish heavy metal rocker named J. Ahola (there's only one Dio or Ian Gillan etc., but this guy has a magnificant voice!) and uploading the vids into my channel, MysticalMaidens. Example at: http://www.youtube.com/user/MysticalMaidens#p/u/1/VUcIKvfRoBs
Anyway, I'd be interested to know about the selection process... if someone can advise, I'd be greatful. Thanks.
PLEASE upgrade your servers and bandwidth, it's almost completely dead now! SLOW AS HELL :( bandwidth was already an issue in the past (for about 20% of the time i think) but now it is just completely ridiculous - i guess i would need to wait 10 minutes until a 2 minute video has loaded. and no, it's not because my ISP.
You tube is world famous video showing and sharing valuable information among the people.Now they are improving video quality and launching mew 1080p HD.
Why don't you guys try fixing all the other crap wrong with this site instead of thinking of more ways to destroy my bandwidth, eh? Like, oh I dunno, making the video loading times not suck...
what nintendo et al said what the point of all this HI DEF VIDEO with LO DEF SOUND? I notice some people get to put up hour long videos-usually lectures etc copywritten material at 10min!? LOL! I think that most popular music of worry are songs 3-4-5 mins long TOPS But then there is the famous 'DMCA challenge' "I know its CW material, but i intend to use it for peaceful, non violent purposes, to feed the hungry or to save the planetn'et al I think a nice time compromise would be 15:15:00 -other wise youd have to buy the state of OREGON (which is for LEASE btw,) for a Server Farm- and please-at least 48kz and 32 bit sampling- I mean lets get serious here hi rez PQ with 2 paper cups on a string sound quality aint gonna cut it
Hi, I have problem with uploading HD video size 720-30. Length is 9.59 min and size 1.28GB. After it was uploaded, on my channel it shows only 7.17 min, and rest of it was like cut off. Can someone tell me, why? Thank you.
My laptop has no problem streaming 720p and 1080p videos, and it has no problem playing videos in 720p, but the 1080p videos stutter horrifically. Whats the deal?
So I reconverted my video to 1080p, but it weight more than 2GB!! How could I upload it?? Why do not you give at least 4GB for 1080P?
For second try, I compressed it with Xvid and the file size went down to 500MB. Hovewer when I am done with the uploading a massage come up and say some short of mistake massage.
So what could I do now???
My Proshow Producer program also do not support 1080p for youtube just only 720p... But I really would like to upload my show in 1080P.
Somebody tell me what to do, because I am getting unhappy and when I am unhappy I am mad and when I am mad bad things happening!
yeah um, my speed test says im getting 22+ mb per second or faster usually for downloading, and im pretty sure yesterday I downloaded 4 gig in under 30 minutes, with other things prioritized above it,,, but youtube, buffers like crazy on hd, and just stops playing almost, it def doesnt seem to be buffering or doing anything usually. I am using firefox if that matters, but fire fox is better than ie, theres no way anyone programs for ie and not firefox anymore right?
also yo, im always running @ 1080p or higher on all my monitors, and it is really hard to read all the little text when not right up on the screen, i could crash watching vids on youtube, if I could only read it from the couch, please allow people using 1080p (or anything) to have different font sizes.b Also someone mentioned you need to make it so videos will always be HD, well there is an option for that, It just doesnt work :-/
Also please dont butcher sound quality. I had to contact netflix recently about not getting 5.1 sound on MY HD streaming, they acted like noone cares, but I see im not the only one on here talking about audio quality. Thanks
That's awesome. Video quality will be much better from now on. Just Audio and the Commenting system have to be improved. Then we can enjoy YouTube perfectly!
Yeah it is awesome, specially if I could upload something... Trying upload for 4 days now, but somewhere I always get error: http://www.mypicx.com/uploadimg/103847037_11212009_1.png
Follow
Oh my!! I've been waiting for this for ages. Thanks YouTube!
ReplyDeletekind of blurry. just a little. thats ok
ReplyDeleteWhen you click the photographs, they can't be found ? Luckily i know first hand what 1080p is cuz of Blu Rays
ReplyDeleteYay! Hopefully I'll get to use this on my PS3!
ReplyDeletecool
ReplyDeleteWow! my pc can run hd but my net maybe a little slow for it. but it still all good :P
ReplyDeletegood (:
ReplyDeleteGracias. Pronto será el streaming. Luego el streaming en HD desde celulares
ReplyDeleteYEAH!GOOD!
ReplyDeleteNow please make it so that you have a setting in the playback quality to "Always watch HD and HQ videos when available" so I can stop having to click on the HD button.
ReplyDeleteGreat suggestion greg400!!!!!!!!
ReplyDeleteThis is awesome! Only thing is I've uploaded all my other stuff at 720...now I'll want to re-upload it. lol
ReplyDeleteWOW AWESOME!!!!!!!
ReplyDeleteStill no HTML 5 open web video with a free codec like Ogg Theora/Vorbis? Or hurry up with On2 already!!!
ReplyDeleteOMG that's awesome! haha that's weird that this happens the same day I get a high-def screen for my computer :)
ReplyDeleteSo is 1080p 4mbit/s since 720p is 2mbit/s?
ReplyDeleteHow much more processing power do you think is required to actually be able to playback the 1080p quality?
I've been uploading 720p videos at my techvideoblog.com since 2005, I guess I'll have to consider recording now in 1080p and spend twice as much time uploading the HD quality videos.
It's about time...
ReplyDelete3 weeks ago, I tried upload 1080P, took 20 hours and error shows up, I love it, I hope fast upload service. Only problem: it might slow everybody down.
ReplyDeleteAre the first two images flipped? Standard is supposed to be smaller than HQ.
ReplyDeleteFor those downloading (as the bandwidth here is rather slow) and watching youtube,
ReplyDeletewhat's the difference between
HQ18, HQ22, HQ35, HQ.flv and
what how to identify 1080p when downloading?
Why not use a 1080p image of the dog and then scale it down? (blur!)
ReplyDeleteYAY!!!!
ReplyDeleteDOES THIS MEAN THAT THERE WILL BE NO HD BUTTON ON 720P VIDEOS?!?!!?
will 720p60 also be enabled?
ReplyDeleteOh no! Still on 640 by 480 video format! I need upgrade soon!
ReplyDelete...hey what the crap, why did you guys lower the audio quality of 720p, and by extension now 1080p is lower than 720p used to be!
ReplyDelete720p used to be ~232kbps VBR AAC, but now it and 1080p are nearly the same as 480p!
Why should we have HD videos with SD-level audio?
'Fall of the Republic' - full hq version
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VebOTc-7shU
What bitrate are you encoding the 720 and 1080 videos at?
ReplyDeletelol. some of my video been 1080p for a long time. now it going pay off for uploading bigger file :P
ReplyDeleteThanks, YouTube, for an early Christmas gift! XD
ReplyDeleteAwesome!
ReplyDeleteAs part of this, will you also be adding support for uploading and processing large 1080p HD video in avchd (.mts, .mtb) format? I've been able to upload smaller files in this format (.mts) but uploading of a 7 minute, 860GB file in this format failed repeatedly.
Youtube also doesn't support .mtb at all (.mtb is the format JVC Everio's software saves edited .mts files in).
looks like i can record full resolution now
ReplyDeleteNice feature! Although file sizes will be huge! I would suggest extending the time limit next.
ReplyDeletePut me down as another user wondering what bit rate will be used for 1080 content. Also how will the anamorphic formats be handled, eg 1440x1080, 1888x1062, etc?
ReplyDeleteMy guess is 1080p will be encoded and streamed at around 4mbit/s to keep the same quality per pixel ratio of the current Youtube 720p 2mbit/s contents.
ReplyDeletethanks youtube
ReplyDeleteThis is very good news. Well done for the upgrade. The question... AVCHD output max 1080i. Those interlaced videos are going to converted to 1080p or users must upload 1080p to get 1080p playback on YouTube?
ReplyDelete1080p is only going to suck up more of the bandwidth that you don't have. So many videos these days, including non-HQ/HD ones, take FOREVER to load. The existing quality you have now is fine, adding 1080p is only going to worsen the experience for everyone. Add more bandwidth/servers before releasing this! In theory it sounds good but in reality it sucks :P
ReplyDeleteNow if Youtube would get rid of that 10 minute time limit...
ReplyDeleteawesome....
ReplyDeleteCool but for slow connection users they may get some trouble coz of buffering In HD 1080p .
ReplyDeleteThis is stunning news. Can't wait to see it.
ReplyDeleteinteresting...
ReplyDeleteI wonder if more HD cameras will be sold now?
Partnership with YouTube would be great for anyone selling high-end HD cameras.
Very nice, ive been waiting for this. Unfortunately, since there are over twice as many pixels in one 1080p frame as there are in a 720p frame, it it going to be buffer hell for people unless they have VERY fast internet. (At least 10 MBPS)
ReplyDeleteAlso, full HD cameras are very expensive.
WHEN are you going to upgrade the sound?
ReplyDeleteYour instructions note you can only upload 44khz
at the very least you should broadcast in 48k, 32 bit
ideally up to 96K 32 bit (dont if that part is applicable or not)
Hi rez picture
lo-fi sound......?????
great! especially for fullscreen-view thats awesome! thanks guys, cant wait to see it!!
ReplyDeleteGlad to see I'm not the only one worried about the sound, but don't expect 32 bit since very few if anything can playback at that. However 24 bit is definitely possible, but they really should fix the bitrate first. I mean really, ~124kbps AAC? Really? Shouldn't we be using near-lossless for 1080p, if not pure lossless?
ReplyDeleteAnd for the user that asked me earlier what bitrate I'm uploading at: pure lossless. Lossless 32bit color video and 44.1KHz 16bit PCM audio.
Oh, though I should say that my most recent audio-videos had audio quality @ 96KHz 32 bit float PCM (they were exported MIDIs with a very high-quality soundfont)
ReplyDeleteSo um, when are we going to be allowed to have video files that are longer than 10 minutes?
ReplyDeleteAnd why are my videos always cut off by a few seconds at the end?
If it makes you feel any better, YouTube actually supports up to 11 minutes. They've already said years ago that the ~10 minute limit was to reduce copy-righted content, since that's what apparently the majority of the videos that long were.
ReplyDeleteFor anyone interested in specs and bitrates, here's what MediaInfo says about this example of a reletively high-motion video:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2iyY9xLLwoY&fmt=37
General
Complete name : F:\video.mp4
Format : MPEG-4
Format profile : Base Media / Version 2
Codec ID : mp42
File size : 81.0 MiB
Duration : 2mn 22s
Overall bit rate : 4 770 Kbps
Encoded date : UTC 2009-11-11 17:58:50
Tagged date : UTC 2009-11-11 17:58:50
gsst : 0
gstd : 142988
gssd : BD075FE84
Video
ID : 2
Format : AVC
Format/Info : Advanced Video Codec
Format profile : High@L4.0
Format settings, CABAC : Yes
Format settings, ReFrames : 3 frames
Codec ID : avc1
Codec ID/Info : Advanced Video Coding
Duration : 2mn 22s
Bit rate mode : Variable
Bit rate : 4 641 Kbps
Maximum bit rate : 9 367 Kbps
Width : 1 920 pixels
Height : 1 080 pixels
Display aspect ratio : 16:9
Frame rate mode : Constant
Frame rate : 29.970 fps
Resolution : 24 bits
Colorimetry : 4:2:0
Scan type : Progressive
Bits/(Pixel*Frame) : 0.075
Stream size : 78.8 MiB (97%)
Title : (C) 2007 Google Inc. v08.13.2007.
Encoded date : UTC 2009-11-11 17:58:50
Tagged date : UTC 2009-11-11 17:58:54
Audio
ID : 1
Format : AAC
Format/Info : Advanced Audio Codec
Format version : Version 4
Format profile : LC
Format settings, SBR : No
Codec ID : 40
Duration : 2mn 22s
Bit rate mode : Variable
Bit rate : 125 Kbps
Maximum bit rate : 149 Kbps
Channel(s) : 2 channels
Channel positions : L R
Sampling rate : 44.1 KHz
Resolution : 16 bits
Stream size : 2.13 MiB (3%)
Title : (C) 2007 Google Inc. v08.13.2007.
Encoded date : UTC 2009-11-11 17:58:50
Tagged date : UTC 2009-11-11 17:58:54
So DANG, just below 5 Megabits. Odd that it doesn't actually reach 5mbps, leaving enough room that could be filled with... oh I don't know maybe MORE BITS FOR AUDIO?!
just to add my vote for much better audio please :)
ReplyDeleteI just realized that the lack of higher-quality audio is even sillier than I first thought. With YouTube throwing MEGAbits at higher-quality video (maxing out at >9mbps?!), they can't even spare just 200 more KILObits for audio? Really now? REALLY?!
ReplyDeleteI wouldn't have so much beef with this audio stuff IF THEY HADN'T LOWERED THE QUALITY FROM WHAT IT WAS (~232 VBR for 720p)
And I forgot to put my vote in for higher samplerate as well! 96KHz 24bit audio for at 1080p when the source supports it would rock.
And what about 60fps videos? I mean the freakin Nintendo 64 could render games at 60fps (F-Zero x), and here we are with our 1080p HD videos and we're still using 30fps. Hopefully this comes in the future (next year? since 1080p should be the highest quality available for quite a while).
finally i can make use of my 1920x1200 displays........who has interenet fast enough for this though :/
ReplyDeleteI hope also YouTube XL will support this format.. In this way we can see FullHD video from our sofa in TV...
ReplyDeleteawesome!
ReplyDeleteThanks!
ReplyDeleteGrreeaatt...More time for loading a video...Plus the new YouTube player is bad enough...
ReplyDelete"An error has occurred. Please try again later"
How about adding a 1:1 scaling setting while viewing videos (either fullscreen, either normal) to go with this? Any vidcast-type video that contains text should benefit greatly from the lack of blurriness...
ReplyDeletemy connection is 20/20Mb, yet 90% of the time youtube can't deliver "HD".
ReplyDeleteHow about making it so that videos load fast enough on NORMAL QUALITY first?
ReplyDeleteHoly crap my bandwidth is gonna drain faster now
ReplyDeleteNice :) at last!!!
ReplyDeleteWe have now uploaded a 1080P test video .
ReplyDeleteadd &fmt=37 to the end of the url to get 1080P
Look amazing.
youtube.com/watch?v=JGe8DuCy5PU
I feel sad because looks like youtube is moving more towards those having a bandwidth of 1mb or more
ReplyDeleteepic!
ReplyDeleteWhat's the use for it with your crappy internet connection/processing power? You fail to provide a comfortable SD viewing.
ReplyDeleteIn Europe it's a pain to watch youtube videos !
ReplyDeletePlease consider improving your bandwidth before improving HD !!!!
Is this the death of 720P or YouTube, or will that still be an option?
ReplyDeleteMy videos run 1.2gb - 2gb for ~20min videos, do you think they are already 1080p? I know my vidcam is full HD (JVC Everio GZ-HD300). I don't upload direct to YT though. I encode it in Standard HD using Cyberlink Power Director. I guess I should look into this stuff.
ReplyDeleteThe player size is 960 * 540 so where is the HD. Is this when you expand the player to full screen and it plays at 1080p ?
ReplyDeleteI just uploaded a 1080p vid at midnight but it still got chopped back to 720
ReplyDeleteWow this awesome news :D
ReplyDeleteRobin, speak for yourself, I live in Europe and I have no problem with youtube, on the other hand, we do have 100/100 where I live. What I do have a problem with is the flashplayer, which can bring down a Core 2 Duo-based computer to its knees with an SD-movie.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtubegrabit.com/watch?v=DUM1284TqFc
ReplyDeleteCapture those videos in 1080p!
Guess I'll need a new comp.uter 720p vids are already choppy enough for me.
ReplyDeleteWHAT ABOUT THE UPLOADING TIME IN SUCH A CASE OF A HD (HIGH DEFINITION) VIDEOS? I MEAN HOW LONG WILL SUSCH VIDEOS WILL LAST IN THE MAXIMUM TIME OF THE 10 MINUTES ALLOWED BY THE YouTube WORLD WIDE WEB????
ReplyDeleteTHANKS - CONSTANTINOS
P.S. TO YouTube TEAM ONLY:
WHAT ABOUT TO CONVERTER SOFTWARES FROM DD (STANDARD DEFINITION) HD (HIGH DEFINITION) VIDEOS????. IT IS WIDELY KNOWN THAT MOST OF THE VIDEO EDTITING SOFTWARES DOES IT WITH GREAT SUCCESS.
Could you please add a setting to turn scaling off? Because in fullscreen mode, 720p videos look bad scaled up on larger monitors. Oh, and the youtube logo and interface get blurry too, if monitor resolution != video resolution.
ReplyDeleteAre you going to improve your servers so the videos load at a streamable pace then? I've a relatively speedy university connection at the moment, and even the non-HD "HQ" videos load too slow for streamable viewing.
ReplyDeleteThank god I can finally see all the hairs on that dog's nose!
ReplyDeleteEven better quality? Do we actually need this yet?
ReplyDeleteLet us pray that this doesn't just clog up a genius website with cute kittens (kidding, all you lovely ladies)
ReplyDeleteOk, a little off the subject, but WTF youtube? Why is it that every time i log on, more & more of my favorite music videos are being removed 'cause of some copyright bullshit?!! If you let them have their way, more than half of youtube will be 'no longer available' Why is it that sony or wmg will snatch some vids but let others stay? And the 'violations' thing? What constitutes a 'violation'? Especially from a vid that has been up for YEARS with no problem or complaint? WTF?!
ReplyDeleteOMFG YOUTUBE HAVE YOU LOST YOUR MIND?
ReplyDeleteYou have the money to upgrade to 1080p
WHY DONT YOU HAVE THE MONEY TO UPGRADE YOUR SERVERS.
I have 15mbps and cant watch a damn video in normal quality because so many people are on hogging bandwidth. How ever, for example 2:00PM EST, it seems like a time when most people arent on youtube and it runs in HD like very FAST!.
So basically, this feature is useless, because I cant fucking use it because you cant upgrade the damn servers and get more bandwidth.
Thanks for nothing. I hope more people leave YouTube.
Terrific
ReplyDeleteNow we will have video that can make the most of a 40+ inch 1080p TV
Es algo muy bueno,para disfrutar los videos mas claramente es algo fantastico
ReplyDeleteHmm, I uploaded a 23.976 frame rate video and it converted it to 29.970. Near 5 Mbps looks pretty good, but why lower the audio rate? I mean 120 something in AAC isn't bad, but still.
ReplyDeleteHow many people have 1080p cameras? Most of the HD cams I found on the Web could do only 1080i.
ReplyDeleteVery nice. We at the Sivartis Channel have been uploading full 1080p HD since the relaunch back in August. Can't wait to see "Robot, Ninja & Gay Guy" in full HD!
ReplyDelete~Trav
www.youtube.com/sivartis
algi, even if the source is interlaced, only big-screen CRTs can actually play an interlaced signal directly. All modern screens (plasma, LCD, OLED, etc.) can only display in progressive. When playing an interlaced signal, they actually convert it to progressive so that it can be displayed on-screen properly.
ReplyDeleteWill my 1440 x 900 videos suddenly gain it's full resolution one day, or perhaps my 60FPS video, or did it already not work?
ReplyDeleteIt's cool i have one video in 1080p and it will be switched but my Internet is 2 mb /s so it's definitely too slow to load even short full hd video ; /
ReplyDeleteI would rather welcome the ability to upload longer videos (20min), than 1080p. Nice addition.
ReplyDeleteDear YouTube, PLEASE take a reality check. For most people the 720p is already causing performance issues, the Flash player is bad, and is stuttering on even high end setups, and your bandwidth can't keep up as it is.
ReplyDeletebring back number of videos watched to channel pages, stop changing things without user constent, give us the option!!!!
ReplyDelete&fmt=37 is NOT 1080p
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mcTXlfy3k6o&fmt=37
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeletethanks youtube! i'm getting a 1080p camera in a couple months and now i can show it off! i just hope the loading times are decent!
ReplyDeleteAfter uploading and analyzing about two dozen videos of various formats and frame rates, I've discovered that they all get encoded to 29.970 fps now. Why do this and not keep their native frame rate? I didn't see any issues with playback like sync or frame blending, but I only used a short 1 minute clip. After looking at lots of other 1080p and 720p videos uploaded recently, most are 29.970 also. However, some are still 23.976 or 25.000, but very few. Please keep the frame rate native to avoid issues with quality and sync!
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThe priority should be YouTube BANDWITH, not 1080p videos. The quality is good enought right now.
ReplyDeleteThis is wonderful news. I have been using 1080P since the beginning of the year. This may take away some of the slight blur that shows up after upload. Thank you YouTube!!!!
ReplyDeleteI wonder why YouTube still uses Flash for HD videos. It really destroys the quality.
ReplyDeleteCool! But flash technology (plugin) is not too good for this. I hope you are considering open video format like that from html5 with "video" tags. I's now supported by Mozilla Firefox 3.5, and can be easily integrated into other browsers, as it's open :)
ReplyDeletei like to see that as well :) html5 is way much better. i have test it out and it do a really good job.
ReplyDeleteAwesome, even bigger ads inside the video!
ReplyDelete1080p is fine and all, but at least take those borders from the side out, it just ruins a wide screen video in my opinion.
ReplyDeleteThat's amazing! Thanks Youtube!
ReplyDeleteoh great, youtube re-encodes our videos again
ReplyDeletetime to re-sync
Here's an idea lets be happy with the original HD quality because it was good enough and made my computer slow. And then make it were everyday users like me can add videos over 10 minutes!
ReplyDeleteSome of the blogging / tech community doesn't seem to be that impressed?
ReplyDeleteI think it might be the demo video of the dog ...
It's kinda blurry and doesn't show off the resolution that well, this one of mine is much better looking ..
youtube.com/watch?v=JGe8DuCy5PU&fmt=37
why I can`t see now how much vids i`m watched? i got more than 21000 it will come back later? i hope....
ReplyDeleteu should broadcast live on new years eve from places where they celebrate live times square. and please do a yt live 09
ReplyDeleteWow that will be cool but does that me that all my video previously uploaded in 1920x1080 will be re-encoded to 1080P
ReplyDeleteoh yeah can you fix this bug to the beta channel because it is causing Google chrome to crash every them I click on the video in the channel
Nice close-up of the dog's nose, ;)
ReplyDeleteHow fast does my processor need to be to stream HD Videos from Youtube given I have a 10+ MB broadband connection.
ReplyDeleteIt was time..!! All my HD uploads on youtube are 1920x1080
ReplyDeletehey visit my site tipsntrix.tk for all the tips and tricks you need and aslo for any computer realted help.
ReplyDeletePlz
Thank You
for any query email at contact@tipsntrix.tk or ayush@tipsntrix.tk
HD is fine in all, but for years now the view count has been a pain in the ass!! I have a video stuck for 2 weeks now at 313.Please fix the views!!
ReplyDeleteIf you're in Australia where broadband is slow, HD is just an incredible pain in the behind, taking ages to download.
ReplyDeleteAnd worse to upload since the upload speed is often about a fifth of the download speed.
..an update to our speeds is on the cards though, I just hope it still costs $50 a month.
Yes, 1080p will serve high bandwidth customers but for us who are stuck with pricey 256kbps bandwidth here in India we cannot even see the lowest of the lowest bandwidth video.
ReplyDeleteHence a suggestion, along with different format and speed of videos, have an audio stream of the video be available (min 32kbps, max 128kbps) for us to listen and enjoy.
watch this out! :
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zO0oi94iyq8
Super darauf habe ich gewartet. Dann lohnt es sich mein neuer Zi8 doppelt ^^
ReplyDeletePUT BACK THE HOW MANY VIDEOS I WATCHED ON YOUTUBE ON MY HOME PAGE ON YOUTUBE. WHY DID YOU GUY TAKE THAT OFF???? PUT IT BACK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ReplyDeletethat's cool. hope you guys won't cancelled videos with copyright though
ReplyDeleteBut you dont have the bandwith to play standard videos now...
ReplyDeleteThe SD barely load for me as is. Youtube loads extremely slow for me and I have a decent connection but I am wireless.
ReplyDeleteI'm much more upset with the Flash Player still not having v-sync than I am with YouTube's quality.
ReplyDelete1080p looks pixelated
ReplyDeleteIt looks fantastic. What kind of HD camera used? For me it's not look pixelate at 1080p. Even if, it is not as smooth as the others, but still looks clear enough. Milan Hotels
ReplyDeletegood blog.
ReplyDeletemy blog http://baraadam.blogspot.com/
Nintendo Maniac 64,
ReplyDeleteMany people would be happy if an 1080i video could be translated lossles into 1080p. If you display 1080i in 1080p without deinterlacing, the edges become ragged. So it's only technically 1080p, but effectively 1080i.
(But when I posted my first comment, I didn't realize that there culd be cheap 1080p camcorders, as my mind is all-about half-professional ones.)
Is there a way of letting YouTube choose HD 1080 as default? I am getting tired of clicking the HD button.
ReplyDeleteNoticed the following...
ReplyDelete"Have an HD camera? We would love to see your awesome 1080p videos! Be creative and choose subjects that really show off the beauty of your camera. We will run the best examples on our homepage in a future spotlight."
How will you make the selections? This is a new hobby for me, but I've been taking my HD camcorder along to gigs of a Finnish heavy metal rocker named J. Ahola (there's only one Dio or Ian Gillan etc., but this guy has a magnificant voice!) and uploading the vids into my channel, MysticalMaidens. Example at:
http://www.youtube.com/user/MysticalMaidens#p/u/1/VUcIKvfRoBs
Anyway, I'd be interested to know about the selection process... if someone can advise, I'd be greatful.
Thanks.
PLEASE upgrade your servers and bandwidth, it's almost completely dead now! SLOW AS HELL :( bandwidth was already an issue in the past (for about 20% of the time i think) but now it is just completely ridiculous - i guess i would need to wait 10 minutes until a 2 minute video has loaded. and no, it's not because my ISP.
ReplyDeleteyou tube should do this before...............
ReplyDeletemuch before.................
nth special.....................
html 5 is the future. why is there FLASH still on youtube? ugghhhh
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mm20roLPp8s&fmt=37 is full 1080p, 10 minutes long, and loads faster than it plays on my 1.5mbps connection.
ReplyDeleteyoutube is best
ReplyDeleteBlogger Templates
increase the audio bitrate to 200+ kb/s!
ReplyDelete1080p? that's big! whoa!
ReplyDeleteYou tube is world famous video showing and sharing valuable information among the people.Now they are improving video quality and launching mew 1080p HD.
ReplyDeleteR4i 软件
film ve sinema film izle
ReplyDeleteizle ve seyret
film izle
online ve bedava
film izle
yerli ve yabancı
film izle
sinema filmleri
çizgi film izle
film izleme
anime izle
çizgi filmler ve anime izle
erotik film izle
erotik filmler...
erotik film izle
bedava filmleri ve sinemalar
bedava film izle
online ve canlı
online film izle
izlenir....
So when is 1080p available to upload?
ReplyDeleteHmm, it's nice that you support 1080p - but it's NOT, that you don't convert my uploaded video to 1080p.
ReplyDeletewww.youtube.com/watch?v=B-IjoTrim3k
The souce was 1920x1080 25FPS - and what youtube does? They destroyed it.
The quality is not 1080p and even not 720p. The quality is worse...
Please fix the problem!
Thanks
ReplyDeleteHaha I just uploaded a video in HD and it looks AWESOME!
ReplyDeletethat is awsome
ReplyDelete"increase the audio bitrate to 200+ kb/s!"
ReplyDeleteI AGREE COMPLETELY!
How to i know if i am watshing HD 720 or 1080?
ReplyDeleteoh lordy, lord - this is gonna be great & yeah, give that maximum audio!
ReplyDeleteWhy don't you guys try fixing all the other crap wrong with this site instead of thinking of more ways to destroy my bandwidth, eh? Like, oh I dunno, making the video loading times not suck...
ReplyDeleteI have ADSL2+ and YouTube commonly is in rebuffering at 720p HD and posibly even with SD!
ReplyDeleteMy ADSL2+ service is fine, because at Speedtest, I get at least 10 Mbps!
I have determined that I often go to a crawl at only 1 Mbps or around there!
No such crap at Exposure Room, which appears to be in Virginia.
I'm in Vermont.
It looks like the issue is geographical location, and thus most stuff from California will go slow like a snail!
1080p sounds good, but most people lack the bandwidth and/or computer power to watch it. Not to mention Youtube is often very slow.
ReplyDeletethe youtube dev team's time would be much better spent working on fixing this pile of crap you call a site.
Too bad the new channels still suck!
ReplyDeleteCan't Wait!!!!
ReplyDeleteMy pc can't even handle the 720p so I supose the 1080p is totaly out of the question :s
ReplyDeletewhat nintendo et al said
ReplyDeletewhat the point of all this HI DEF VIDEO with LO DEF SOUND?
I notice some people get to put up hour long videos-usually lectures etc
copywritten material at 10min!? LOL!
I think that most popular music of worry are songs 3-4-5 mins long TOPS
But then there is the famous 'DMCA challenge' "I know its CW material, but i intend to use it for peaceful, non violent purposes, to feed the hungry or to save the planetn'et al
I think a nice time compromise would be 15:15:00 -other wise youd have to buy the state of OREGON (which is for LEASE btw,) for a Server Farm- and please-at least 48kz and 32 bit sampling- I mean lets get serious here hi rez PQ with 2 paper cups on a string sound quality aint gonna cut it
Pretty epic!
ReplyDeletecool, I have many 1080 already uploaded and converted
ReplyDeleteHi, I have problem with uploading HD video size 720-30. Length is 9.59 min and size 1.28GB.
ReplyDeleteAfter it was uploaded, on my channel it shows only 7.17 min, and rest of it was like cut off.
Can someone tell me, why? Thank you.
Ok, now allow us to direct stream the video source instead of the flash-encoded version for the best possible experience...
ReplyDeleteOoo very nice :D And the file sizes won't be that huge, they'll just take a lot longer to render XD If you're exporting as WMV that is
ReplyDeleteThat's only a zoomed in image, not HD. Bad example.
ReplyDeleteCool like it a lot !!!
ReplyDeleteBut on what for resulution must you convert your video to get Full HD ???
Here's some of my work with the RED ONE Camera down converted from 4k to 1080p.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k_Zc1MB8n9A
http://www.youtube.com/user/Kyole#p/a/u/1/Owz21eTtCZE
My question is how do some videos have a 720/1080 option and others dont?
Nice!! Bring it!
ReplyDeleteUpdate:
ReplyDeleteA video demonstration in HD looked the best in YouTube and loaded without the rebuffering crap!
Hooray!
Well, this is going to take a while to load these videos...
ReplyDeleteFor those of you who want HQ video as a preset, go to this page and select the appropriate radio button and hit save.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/account#playback/quality
tam aka twotamburgers
My laptop has no problem streaming 720p and 1080p videos, and it has no problem playing videos in 720p, but the 1080p videos stutter horrifically. Whats the deal?
ReplyDeleteThank god for the new GPU accelerated Flash, or else, this would murder my laptop.
ReplyDeleteEh, wish my internet was fast enough to support it -_-
ReplyDelete720p is optimum. 1080p too high for this platform.
ReplyDeleteaaaaKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLDJJJJLKSJJLDAKASDJFKSJLKAKSDAAA
ReplyDeleteKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKASDJFAJFSJSDAKSDFLJKJLKAJLKASs
ReplyDeleteSo I reconverted my video to 1080p, but it weight more than 2GB!! How could I upload it?? Why do not you give at least 4GB for 1080P?
ReplyDeleteFor second try, I compressed it with Xvid and the file size went down to 500MB. Hovewer when I am done with the uploading a massage come up and say some short of mistake massage.
So what could I do now???
My Proshow Producer program also do not support 1080p for youtube just only 720p... But I really would like to upload my show in 1080P.
Somebody tell me what to do, because I am getting unhappy and when I am unhappy I am mad and when I am mad bad things happening!
Right On YouTube!!!! I have been put allot of mine up in 1080 for a while now can't wait to see them the way they were ment to!! BRAVO!!! Duke
ReplyDeletestill waiting till they implement the HNSL321452 v.4.5 and delitron acelerator. Until then I will sit back and cry
ReplyDeletePretty pointless if you don't even have a 1080p monitor. That's 1920x1080 pixels of resolution.
ReplyDeleteDoes any expert from youtube watching this topic? Or why for it if I do not get answers for my questions?
ReplyDeleteBLOWS!!! And for what reason? for more partner shit?
ReplyDeletenice i have an 1080P cam but a sugestion is a youtube editor so you can edit out mistakes out of the video or combine other vids
ReplyDeletethis be cool for better HD my pc runs all HD fine=)
ReplyDeleteno no no no no no no no no no no no
ReplyDeleteyou can not support the bandwidth the way it is why do this... no no no no no no no
Standard looks the best.
ReplyDeleteyeah um, my speed test says im getting 22+ mb per second or faster usually for downloading, and im pretty sure yesterday I downloaded 4 gig in under 30 minutes, with other things prioritized above it,,, but youtube, buffers like crazy on hd, and just stops playing almost, it def doesnt seem to be buffering or doing anything usually. I am using firefox if that matters, but fire fox is better than ie, theres no way anyone programs for ie and not firefox anymore right?
ReplyDeletealso yo, im always running @ 1080p or higher on all my monitors, and it is really hard to read all the little text when not right up on the screen, i could crash watching vids on youtube, if I could only read it from the couch, please allow people using 1080p (or anything) to have different font sizes.b Also someone mentioned you need to make it so videos will always be HD, well there is an option for that, It just doesnt work :-/
ReplyDeleteAlso please dont butcher sound quality. I had to contact netflix recently about not getting 5.1 sound on MY HD streaming, they acted like noone cares, but I see im not the only one on here talking about audio quality. Thanks
"standard looks the best" You must not have a monitor then. Analog cathode ray tube is not the best thing to view HD things on
ReplyDeleteI need help, whenever i try to upload a video in 1080p hd it always says fail to upload. And im sure the video is 1920x1080
ReplyDeleteyoutube 4 ever
ReplyDeleteWow! thats great for my videos
ReplyDeleteThat's awesome. Video quality will be much better from now on. Just Audio and the Commenting system have to be improved. Then we can enjoy YouTube perfectly!
ReplyDeleteYeah it is awesome, specially if I could upload something... Trying upload for 4 days now, but somewhere I always get error: http://www.mypicx.com/uploadimg/103847037_11212009_1.png
ReplyDeletewhat the....youboob cant even keep up streaming with 720p sometimes and now they are going 1080p!!! whats the bitrate gonna be?? prolly 3mbit/sec
ReplyDelete1080p videos are in youtube now!! only some though!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQa-EfAkc5g this is a Full HD video in youtube!
ReplyDeleteWhat next? Blue-Ray playback support? lol.
ReplyDeletekick ass
ReplyDeleteok
ReplyDeleteNice!
ReplyDeleteI would appreciate if you start encoding vids from japanese lessies first please.
ReplyDelete